Master lateral reading and the SIFT method as the most effective approach to rapid source evaluation.
Studies of professional fact-checkers found they evaluate sources very differently from students. Students read sources deeply before evaluating them. Fact-checkers leave the source immediately and search for what others say about it — lateral reading.
Reading a source deeply to evaluate it is inefficient and unreliable — sophisticated misinformation is designed to withstand deep reading. Lateral reading leverages the collective knowledge of journalists, fact-checkers, and researchers who have already evaluated sources.
You encounter an article from "The National Report." Instead of reading it, you open a new tab and search "The National Report." Within seconds you find it is a known satire website. You have evaluated the source in 30 seconds without reading a word of the article.
Many news articles cite studies or reports without linking to them. When a claim seems important, trace it back to the original source — the actual study, government report, or primary document. Often the original source says something different from how it was reported.
Headlines often misrepresent the studies they cite. "Study shows X causes Y" may actually be a correlation study with no causal claim. Always read the original study, not just the headline.
Ready to test your knowledge?
3 questions · Grade 8 level